My approaches towards an ideal society are embodied in the equivalent value of lives. For this theory, two different approaches are required.
When it comes to the real equivalent value of lives, grouping all people, without exception can be the best strategy. I argue it is the best approach to focus on sameness rather than differences, for this topic.
Regarding individual diversity, although our inner world is one of the human essences, its importance tends to be neglected due to its uncertain form, this causes a poor understanding, in my experience. Thus, I attempt to draw attention to our inner world by suggesting its mysterious indescribable depth.
Since I see the multiplicity of human essence, as various as at least the number of human beings, as well we can never be other people, the only way I can talk about this essence appropriately, is to suggest mine as a case.
I also pursue to have a more intuitive and sensational interaction beyond our differences and education. I believe that our communication these days is relying on visuals and languages in a totality. It is not how I find communication in the first place, it also relates to categorizing people. Categorizing is the activity based on the differences that is against my strategy of focusing on sameness, towards the equivalent value of lives. Because it also can be a way to distinguish people, to give advantage to a group in the conversation no matter my purpose.